News

BT recalls engineers after Kensington & Chelsea rejects ‘unsightly’ broadband boxes

Summary:

The telecoms giant faced opposition to its planned installation of new fibre optic hubs, deemed unsightly, on the borough’s historic streets.

Image:

By Robert Edwards

British Telecom recalled its engineers from up-market Kensington & Chelsea after the authority refused permission to install ‘ugly’ broadband boxes in the borough. 

The telecoms giant faced opposition to its planned installation of new fibre optic hubs, deemed unsightly, on the borough’s historic streets and among its listed buildings.  
 

The new ‘obtrusive’ green cabinets, measuring 1.6 meters in height, are larger than the 1.15m boxes currently operated. 

“BT has not worked in a spirit of cooperation and needs to consider our historic streetscape,” said a council spokesman.  
 

Of the 108 planning applications submitted, 96 were denied, and the council say BT are reluctant to compromise on the location or design of boxes. 

BT says the council’s decision will affect around 34,200 homes and businesses in the borough.  
 

“Other councils, including those of neighbouring boroughs, have shown a greater eagerness to enjoy the benefits of fibre broadband,” said a BT spokesman.  

“We will therefore re-focus our engineers’ efforts in other areas where planning authorities have taken a positive approach.”  
 

The planned expansion would have provided connection speeds ten times faster than the existing infrastructure.

“Kensington and Chelsea could become an island of slow connectivity,” said BT’s spokesman. “A desert of 20th century technology in a 21st century city.” 
 

The council spokesman said they regret the conflict of interests with BT, but said Richard Branson’s Virgin Group are a viable alternative.  

“Virtually the whole borough is already covered by super-fast broadband with Virgin, who obviously appreciate the very valuable market the borough represents,” he said. 
 

“Virgin have been able to do this without ruining our historic streetscape.”

The debacle raises questions as to whether the authority’s stringent planning rules, which protect its attractive Edwardian setting, are a barrier to progress.

Follow us on @SW_Londoner

Related Articles